- “Divide et Impera” at the time of Alexander the Great
- Exasperated competition in modern companies
- The limits and risks of excessively heated competition
- The reasons that push workers to adopt hyper-competitive behaviors
A healthy rivalry within the company is desirable but the excesses are to be understood in time.
Whether pushed by managers or self-reeinged, competition among employees in the various business departments is effective as long as there remains a constructive push to achieve common goals. If competitive impulses become excessive they can be destabilizing.
The famous phrase “Divide et Impera” that the past has handed down to us and that well molds itself in every situation of conflict, it seems to be attributable to Philip II of Macedonia,father of Alexander the Great, who managed militarily to reunite Greece at the expense of the countless tribes and military factions present on the territory.
In the modern world, the strategy wants to express a system of power that is deliberately fragmented, in a condition of eternal balance between internal conflicts and impulses to prevail, in order to shine towards the higher hierarchical step.
From a managerial point of view,having a team made up of competitive elements that hold small areas of power, fractional of each other, can be, if well managed, an important force in achieving common goals.
But the problems can arise when the competition, between the team members, transcends into a creeping state of infighting, concealed by the reason to achieve the goal of the team, which could be a budget or the finalization of other goals.
The team born to be a ram in the market,which should be composed of intelligence, constancy, heart, reliability, loyalty and team spirit, could begin its slow transformation with the creation of internal factions that have the primary purpose of running alone and discrediting other team members.
The first thing that can happen is the creation of a new team within the group, enlisting the “faithful” on one side and the other, immediately interrupting the lines of communication.
The factions no longer talk about professionally relevant things, trying to maintain normal social behavior, creating a carbon-based climate where apparently the working climate within the team seems peaceful.
Each component of the factions instills much more psycho-physical energies into the work, but it does not always manage to turn them into efficient operation as the information chain can be fragmentary or deliberately not complete or correct.
There are many reasons for workers to engage in hyper-competitive behaviours between them:
The circulation of information must be objective and comprehensive and evenly distributed to all so that everyone can process it and make their own contribution in interpreting it in order to generate a better intervention strategies.
Automatic translation. We apologize for any inaccuracies. Original article in Italian.